EDITED TO ADD: all feed and cargo properly via my press, apart from that S&B are occasionally quite difficult to seat. The only real dud primer I have at any time experienced was an S&B LP. I think it was missing an anvil. Gain seems to contain the loosest QC on cup shape and top.
The leading question that remains for me is how the primers final results might differ amongst diverse cartridges, bullet weights, and powder masses. It's got generally been my impact that small ES/SD correspond to optimized combustion; that's to state once the primer, cartridge volume (stress mobile), powder charge, were all optimized to give exceptional combustion for just a presented bullet body weight. It can be over and above issue that switching primers can typically increase (lower) ES/SD that has a supplied load.
Have also observed which they show pressure indicators ahead of another's. This is simply not a "quantum leap" difference, just detect the "softness" when seating them. The Remington small pistol primers also give a similiar experience, mabe not as pronounced.
Is the listing on the model of instances and primer just making their analyzed masses as accurately represented as they can be to ensure that the reloader to reproduce their effects? Simply click to expand...
Then Winchester S&B and Rem. Way down to the checklist is Federal. These are good primers, but I haven't got handguns that need to have softies. So their packaging is exactly what retains me from obtaining additional if I've a choice.
I agfree with Colorado4QWheel. I happen to be loading on my 550 due to the fact 1994 and that includes several thousand CCI primers. I have never had a challenge with them not heading in uncomplicated. I have talked Using the Dillon people often times, but never ever about primer challenges, considering the fact that I in no way had any, so don't know if their opinion remains the same as described earlier mentioned.
IIRC, the Lee Internet site has updated the listing about which primers are ok to implement. They now seem to one out FEDERAL exclusively:
My community gun store primer shelf is packed with manufacturer name primers in each and every dimensions. Only downside is the worth.
Increase to quote Only clearly show this person #1 · Dec 1, 2024 A compact 9mm (not a Ruger) I've not too long ago started to ftf so I sent it back again and the producer "preset" it. When it continued with smooth strikes I investigated primers and decided to swap from CCI to Federal which I am informed are the softest.
Add to quotation Only show this person #eight · Mar 31, 2012 I wonder if Federal believes that there's some thing to get attained by a rather smaller primer/primer pocket diameter specification, or if the primary difference was learned and federal primers large rifle identified to Expense a lot more to fix than it was value.
The Ginex primers may be as much as four or 5 10-thousandths larger when compared to the Feds and also your micro would hardly ever know the real difference. A wee little bit off subject matter, but greatly linked, I found Fed SPM’s at Brownells this morning for $89 + haz and (acceptable) shipping and delivery. Hope I'm Mistaken, but I think primers are likely to go in the roof now presented recent functions
Laurie loaded .308 Gain ammo* with sixteen LR primer types after which you can analyzed for typical velocity, ES/SD, and team dimension. This can be essentially the most in depth and complete LR primer examination at any time done. Here i will discuss the primer kinds examined:
In case the recipe requires a "Small Pistol Primer", and it claims Winchester, If all I will get is CCI, then that's what I use. I've under no circumstances experienced a difficulty nonetheless. But that is me. Another person could possibly have another belief.
That is good to find out ... I have a good many 38 Unique cases that I reload with +P masses and a lot of the primer pockets have become much too easy to seat primers in .